<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Model Version of FFA Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firearmsfreedomact.com/model-version-of-ffa-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firearmsfreedomact.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:31:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Fuhrer</title>
		<link>http://firearmsfreedomact.com/model-version-of-ffa-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Fuhrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firearmsfreedomact.com/?page_id=72#comment-974</guid>
		<description>I think it is past time that Alabama has a similar law defining the limits of the Federal Government regarding state&#039;s rights in the manufacture and posession of firearms and all accessories pertaining to firearms. There is a bill in the House (HB48) that is a good start, but the state Senate is lagging behind in this matter. Also, the House bill has no co-sponsors, which indicates that the Representatives do not wish to support their constituents wishes. I suggest that the Governor, Senators, and Representatives get the ball rolling on this, and quickly before the Fall elections come about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is past time that Alabama has a similar law defining the limits of the Federal Government regarding state&#8217;s rights in the manufacture and posession of firearms and all accessories pertaining to firearms. There is a bill in the House (HB48) that is a good start, but the state Senate is lagging behind in this matter. Also, the House bill has no co-sponsors, which indicates that the Representatives do not wish to support their constituents wishes. I suggest that the Governor, Senators, and Representatives get the ball rolling on this, and quickly before the Fall elections come about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibertyBlueprint.com &#8250; A Motion for CC2009 Concerning Firearms and the U.S. Constitution</title>
		<link>http://firearmsfreedomact.com/model-version-of-ffa-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>LibertyBlueprint.com &#8250; A Motion for CC2009 Concerning Firearms and the U.S. Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firearmsfreedomact.com/?page_id=72#comment-405</guid>
		<description>[...] http://firearmsfreedomact.com/model-version-of-ffa-legislation/   This was written by admin. Posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009, at 11:20 am. Filed under Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://firearmsfreedomact.com/model-version-of-ffa-legislation/" rel="nofollow">http://firearmsfreedomact.com/model-version-of-ffa-legislation/</a>   This was written by admin. Posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009, at 11:20 am. Filed under Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
