<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gun Groups to Sue over Montana-made and Retained Firearms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firearmsfreedomact.com/2009/08/21/gun-groups-to-sue-over-montana-made-and-retained-firearms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firearmsfreedomact.com/2009/08/21/gun-groups-to-sue-over-montana-made-and-retained-firearms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:32:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://firearmsfreedomact.com/2009/08/21/gun-groups-to-sue-over-montana-made-and-retained-firearms/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firearmsfreedomact.com/?p=85#comment-115</guid>
		<description>@Riley -- The best defense is a good offense. Montana&#039;s attorney general will notify the federal government (BATFE) on October 1st that manufacturers in the state are producing firearms not regulated by BATFE. This will trigger a response from the federal government, which will end up in court. Gun groups mentioned above will support the state in its suit against the feds.

It would be nice if others states were on board by Oct. 1. It would far more difficult for the feds to dismiss as right-wing craziness this Firearm Freedoms Act if more than one or two states were set to sue. I&#039;m waiting for Arizona. They passed a boatload of pro-gun bills right before recess (all of which Gov. Brewer signed); I&#039;m hoping they hop on this FFA while it&#039;s ripe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Riley &#8212; The best defense is a good offense. Montana&#8217;s attorney general will notify the federal government (BATFE) on October 1st that manufacturers in the state are producing firearms not regulated by BATFE. This will trigger a response from the federal government, which will end up in court. Gun groups mentioned above will support the state in its suit against the feds.</p>
<p>It would be nice if others states were on board by Oct. 1. It would far more difficult for the feds to dismiss as right-wing craziness this Firearm Freedoms Act if more than one or two states were set to sue. I&#8217;m waiting for Arizona. They passed a boatload of pro-gun bills right before recess (all of which Gov. Brewer signed); I&#8217;m hoping they hop on this FFA while it&#8217;s ripe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://firearmsfreedomact.com/2009/08/21/gun-groups-to-sue-over-montana-made-and-retained-firearms/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firearmsfreedomact.com/?p=85#comment-97</guid>
		<description>States should make laws against Federal Thugs from coming into the states except under certain circumstances outlined by the states; if they violate that law then they will be arrested and fined a Trillion dollars each offense and bussed back to DC in shackles. A little diesel therapy wouldn&#039;t hurt either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>States should make laws against Federal Thugs from coming into the states except under certain circumstances outlined by the states; if they violate that law then they will be arrested and fined a Trillion dollars each offense and bussed back to DC in shackles. A little diesel therapy wouldn&#8217;t hurt either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riley</title>
		<link>http://firearmsfreedomact.com/2009/08/21/gun-groups-to-sue-over-montana-made-and-retained-firearms/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firearmsfreedomact.com/?p=85#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t quite get the headline of this article.  Whom do the gun-groups want to sue?  The pro-gun legislation is already enacted and in force in Montana and Tennessee.  You don&#039;t have to sue if you like the law the way it is.  If the Feds do nothing, carry on as planned and thank God for liberty.  The thing to do would be to wait for someone to try and sue Montana or Tennessee over it, then go on defense.  Has that happened yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite get the headline of this article.  Whom do the gun-groups want to sue?  The pro-gun legislation is already enacted and in force in Montana and Tennessee.  You don&#8217;t have to sue if you like the law the way it is.  If the Feds do nothing, carry on as planned and thank God for liberty.  The thing to do would be to wait for someone to try and sue Montana or Tennessee over it, then go on defense.  Has that happened yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

